Season 3 of Shark Tank India has found itself entangled in a legal dispute as the Cricket Bat Manufacturers Association of Kashmir (CBMAK) has initiated legal action against Sony Pictures Networks and Tramboo Sports Pvt, the show’s producers. The controversy revolves around statements made during an episode that aired on January 30, 2024, where the Tramboo brothers, founders of Tramboo Sports, asserted themselves as the exclusive producers of Kashmir willow cricket bats.
Allegations by CBMAK:
The CBMAK has filed a lawsuit against Sony Pictures Networks and Tramboo Sports, accusing them of broadcasting inaccurate and misleading information. The association, representing all cricket bat producers in the Kashmir Valley, strongly refuted the Tramboo brothers’ claim to be the sole manufacturer of Kashmir willow cricket bats. This assertion has led to severe consequences, impacting the sales of CBMAK members’ bats and causing reputational damage to the entire indigenous Kashmiri bat-making industry.
Details of the Controversial Episode:
During the Shark Tank India episode, the Tramboo brothers secured a Rs 30 lakh deal, presenting themselves as the exclusive producers of Kashmir willow cricket bats. CBMAK contends that the bats manufactured by the Tramboo brothers belong to a member of their association, and the misinformation has disparaged the hard work and dedication of local bat manufacturers.
The CBMAK has issued a comprehensive legal notice to Sony Pictures Networks and Tramboo Sports, seeking an on-air apology within 15 days. Additionally, the association is pursuing Rs 100 crore in compensation for losses, damage, and mental suffering caused by the false claims made during the show.
Conclusion:
The legal action taken by CBMAK reflects the gravity of the situation, emphasizing the importance of accurate representation and protection of the indigenous industry’s reputation. As Shark Tank India continues to be a significant platform for entrepreneurs, this incident underscores the need for diligence in verifying claims made by participants to maintain the integrity of the show and uphold the credibility of the showcased businesses. The legal proceedings will likely shed light on the responsibilities of reality shows in ensuring the accuracy of the information presented during episodes.
